We assess the significance of each impact by scoring its severity and likelihood. For severity, we consider the scale (how grave the impact is), scope (how widespread it is) and each impact’s irremediable character (how hard it is to put the harm right). Potential impacts are considered against the likelihood of the impact occurring. In addition, we consider the potential financial impact on Meridian over time.
For each impact, we calculate a social and environmental significance score and a financial significance score. Closely related impacts are then grouped into material topics. Each topic is scored and ranked by summing the social and environmental or financial significance scores of its related impacts, using whichever is higher.
In order to determine the material topics and underlying impacts for reporting, we apply a minimum threshold for each axis (impact and financial materiality). This year, the threshold was raised from 45 to 110. This resulted in four topics and nine impacts reported this year, compared to nine topics and 14 impacts in FY25.
Our FY26 material topics in order of priority are:
- Renewable energy generation
- Impacts on the natural world
- Affordability
- Community impact
The topics reported last year that did not meet the FY26 reporting threshold are climate-related impacts, customer decarbonisation, public trust, emissions and waste, cyber and physical security, and people. However, each of these material topics remains strategically important to Meridian and is actively managed. Please refer to our Integrated ESG Data Pack, Climate-related Disclosure and Climate Action Plan to learn more.